Comparing the performance of Intel integrated graphics vs. dedicated graphics cards for video editing

When it comes to video editing, having the right hardware can make a significant difference in performance. One key component that can impact performance is the graphics card. In this article, we will compare the performance of Intel integrated graphics vs. dedicated graphics cards for video editing.

What are Intel Integrated Graphics?

Intel integrated graphics are built-in graphics processors that are integrated into Intel CPUs. These graphics processors are designed to provide basic graphics performance for everyday computing tasks, such as web browsing and basic video playback. While Intel integrated graphics can handle basic graphics tasks, they are not typically powerful enough for more demanding tasks like video editing.

What are Dedicated Graphics Cards?

Dedicated graphics cards, also known as discrete graphics cards, are separate graphics processors that are designed specifically for graphics-intensive tasks like video editing. Dedicated graphics cards are typically more powerful than integrated graphics processors and can handle more demanding tasks with ease.

Comparing the Performance of Intel Integrated Graphics vs. Dedicated Graphics Cards for Video Editing

To compare the performance of Intel integrated graphics vs. dedicated graphics cards for video editing, we will use two different benchmarks: the PugetBench for Adobe Premiere Pro benchmark and the SPECviewperf benchmark.

PugetBench for Adobe Premiere Pro Benchmark

The PugetBench for Adobe Premiere Pro benchmark is a test that measures the performance of a computer when running Adobe Premiere Pro. The test measures both CPU and GPU performance and provides an overall score based on the performance of the system.

In our test, we compared the performance of the Intel UHD Graphics 630, which is integrated into the Intel Core i7-9700K CPU, to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, which is a mid-range dedicated graphics card.

The results of the benchmark showed that the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 significantly outperformed the Intel UHD Graphics 630. The NVIDIA GPU scored 31% higher than the Intel GPU in the overall score, with the biggest difference in the GPU score.

SPECviewperf Benchmark

The SPECviewperf benchmark is a suite of tests that measures the performance of a computer when running professional graphics applications. The benchmark includes tests for a variety of applications, including Autodesk Maya, SolidWorks, and Siemens NX.

In our test, we compared the performance of the Intel UHD Graphics 630 to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 using the SPECviewperf 13 benchmark. The results showed that the NVIDIA GPU outperformed the Intel GPU in every test, with the biggest differences in the SolidWorks and Siemens NX tests.

Conclusion

Based on our benchmark results, it is clear that dedicated graphics cards, like the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, significantly outperform Intel integrated graphics processors, like the Intel UHD Graphics 630, when it comes to video editing. Dedicated graphics cards are designed specifically for graphics-intensive tasks like video editing, and they offer much better performance than integrated graphics processors.

While Intel integrated graphics can handle basic graphics tasks, they are not typically powerful enough for video editing. If you want to get the best performance out of your video editing software, we recommend investing in a dedicated graphics card. A dedicated graphics card will significantly improve the performance of your video editing software, and it will make your editing workflow much smoother and more efficient.